Top Green Business Stories of 2006

It's that time again -- a time of "bests," "worsts," and "top tens" from the year just passed. I'm happy to jump into the fray, having just reviewed more than 500 news and feature stories we ran on GreenBiz.com and its sister sites during 2006. That little trip down Memory Lane presented an opportunity to see shapes as well as details -- to observe the trends that emerged or accelerated during the year in the area of business and the environment.

In choosing the year's Top Ten, it would have been easy to home in on the headline-grabbers: our addiction to oil, An Inconvenient Truth, the Stern Review -- oh, and that U.S. election in November. All critical developments, to be sure. But I prefer to focus on how companies are responding to these and other developments -- and leveraging them to derive business benefit and leadership status.

The quick summary: While a couple of new issues or companies gained traction last year, 2006 did not offer any sea change in how companies are addressing environmental challenges. Rather, the year saw a continuation of existing trends: big companies moving in the right direction, but most having a long, long way to go.

I supposed that's all one can expect from the mainstream business community: a gradual, incremental transition to more sustainable policies, products, and practices -- not breakthrough, disruptive change. A boy can dream, though.

Herewith, in no particular order, are my picks for oh-six:

1. Wal-Mart Goes from Zero to Hero
If you've been reading these pages lately, you've seen a succession of stories about Wal-Mart's environmental commitments: its efforts to reduce the toxic ingredients of the products it sells; its five-year plan to reduce packaging; its commitment to green its textile supply chain; its pledge to sell 100 million compact fluorescent light bulbs in 2007; its potentially ravenous appetite for solar; and more.

I'll be honest: I didn't see it coming. The green utterings (PDF) of the company's CEO, Lee Scott, notwithstanding, it was hard to imagine that this much-maligned, seemingly intransigent company could change much, if at all. But I'll be the first to give credit where it's due. Wal-Mart -- like Nike, Starbucks, McDonald's, and several other corporations prodded toward sustainability by activists -- seems hellbent to be a leader, and appears to be putting its considerable heft behind that notion. And there's much more to come, I've been told by several of the consultants, enviros, and others that have been spending more time than they ever imagined in Bentonville, Arkansas.

To be sure, Wal-Mart is far from green, and it has other issues -- labor, community, etc. -- to clean up before it can be considered a truly "good" company. But over the past year, I've found myself fascinated with the conversations taking place in Bentonville. And if Wal-Mart can embrace green, it feels like anything is possible.

2. Alt-Fuel Vehicles Get in Gear
Just one year ago, it didn't feel like there was much hope for alternatively fueled vehicles, notwithstanding a handful of hybrids and a few bold but hopelessly miniscule companies seeking to create a market for small commuter cars and other niche products.

But seemingly out of nowhere, alt-fuel vehicles have gotten traction. And while it may not yet have hit the fast lane, it's at least moving in the right direction. General Motors began the year with its Live Green, Go Yellow campaign, along with a larger effort to help grow a "flex-fuel" infrastructure. It seemed to garner a measure of eco-cred that the company hadn't seen in quite a while. Of course, many people are asking tough questions about the viability and sustainability of a corn-based fuel supply -- and debating when alternatives to corn could be ready for market. Still, the quest for the "flex-fuel freeway" is in forward gear.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the pump: without a lot of fanfare or hype -- indeed, with some initial resistance from Big Auto -- the notion of the electric vehicle, which some had famously considered to have been killed, started showing signs of life. Starting with hobbyists and tech-geeks, then spreading to venture-backed companies like Tesla Motors, plug-in electric vehicles became the talk of Detroit, Tokyo and beyond. By year's end, Toyota and GM had both announced plans to introduce plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles, and the electric car seemed like it might be on the road to recovery.

3. Carbon Neutral Brings Hope and Hype
In the be-careful-what-you-wish-for category, "climate neutral" became the word of the year for 2006. That's good news, of course: the notion of offsetting or zeroing out one's climate footprint has long been a dream of environmentalists. But the word gained such popularity, with no clear guidance over its use, that it became -- well, not exactly full of hot air, but close.

Everyone and everything, it seems, went climate neutral last year: cars, fuels, vacations, corporate headquarters, flowers, musical acts, major sporting events, even large multinational institutions.

But what does it all mean? The onset of offsets has led to growing scrutiny by climate experts, activists, and others about how to define "carbon neutral" (or what to even call it) and what standards companies and others seeking that lofty status should meet. It's controversial stuff, to be sure, and the debates will only become more heated as more companies offering carbon-neutral services enter the field -- and more of their customers hype their carbon-neutral achievements. With offsets expected to become big business, this will be one hot topic for the foreseeable future.

4. Financial Sector Takes on Climate
"Follow the money," goes the classic movie line, and if you want to see who's driving corporate action on climate change, that's exactly what you need to do.

With climate change increasingly seen as a serious risk to insurers, that industry last year ramped up its efforts to fully understand and address those risks, along with the inherent opportunities. The U.S. association of state insurance commissioners launched a task force to examine how climate change may affect the availability and affordability of insurance. A few companies began to introduce innovative products and services, such as carbon emissions credit guarantees, or rate credits and other incentives for commercial building owners who re-build damaged properties to LEED-certified standards. A Japanese insurer, Tokio Marine & Nichido Life, took it upon itself to reforest more than 7,500 acres of mangroves in Asia to minimize losses from rising cyclone-related risks.

It wasn't just the insurers. The smart money on climate seems to be moving in the direction of large investment firms, which are beginning to see climate as a driver of risk and opportunity for publicly traded companies. Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, and Swiss Re -- financial giants all -- stepped up efforts to integrate climate change into their lending policies, investment portfolios, or overall strategy.

And where the money goes, as Deep Throat taught us, politicians are sure to follow.

5. Investors Flex Their Muscle on Climate
In some ways, banks and insurers are the least of it. Shareholders -- specifically, large institutional investors like pension funds and university endowments -- are emerging as the real power brokers in the climate arena. Last year, the Carbon Disclosure Project, a coalition of institutional investors with more than $31.5 trillion in assets, pressed big business to disclose corporate risks and opportunities associated with climate change. Much of this was done under the leadership of the nonprofit group Ceres, which began ranking the top 100 global companies on how climate change will impact them -- whether from expanding greenhouse gas regulations, direct physical impacts, or surging demand for climate-friendly technologies.

The leading investment firms are jumping in, too. Merrill Lynch, for one, issued a report profiling seven companies it believes are best positioned to capitalize on what it calls the "clean car revolution." Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley also published research reports analyzing the financial performance of the carbon markets, sometimes identifying who's naughty and nice -- that is, the leaders and laggards in their various sectors.

That kind of involuntary disclosure from the investment community may be exactly what slower-moving companies need to get off the dime.

6. Renewables Become the New Recycled
Remember way back in the early 1990s, when "recycled" was the cutting edge of corporate environmental practice? Companies competed over the use and percentage of recycled materials in their products -- mostly because it was a marketable claim that the public readily understood.

Now, "green power" is the alluring buzzword du jour, and companies are jumping on board, leapfrogging one another to be seen as the leader, at least for the moment. From Walgreens to Whole Foods, the race is on. Who will build the biggest solar installation? (It's Google's claim for now.) Who will claim the largest purchase of renewable power? (The bragging rights were handed to Wells Fargo in recent months.)

But even the Bush administration's Environmental Protection Agency knows that all these efforts aren't enough. Making a dent in climate change will require tackling some big hairy audacious goals, or at least doing more than buying a few megawatt-hours of wind power. As the stark reality of climate stabilization wedges has demonstrated, big companies need to be doing much more, and doing it much more quickly.

Still, corporate leapfrogging on green power: As the folks at BP say, "It's a start."

7. Water Rises as a Business Issue -- and Opportunity
The issue of water scarcity is hardly new. Neither is the potential risks to businesses from insufficient water quality and quantity; I've written about this on several occasions. Indeed, I wrote about "water as a business issue" in my top stories rundown of 2004.

But the call for change is moving from a trickle to a steady stream. A team of international scientists called for radical action, predicting that water shortages will be happening sooner than previously estimated. Another sobering assessment concluded that water crises increasingly are affecting some of the world's wealthiest nations, suggesting that companies in developed countries could be facing shortages even before some of their Third World brethren.

But amid the challenges are opportunities. Dow, for one, saw fit to launch a business unit to advance the science of desalination, water purification, contaminant removal, and water recycling. It joined GE, Dupont, and other old-line companies eyeing the potential to bring to market new water technologies with the potential to create massive new revenue streams.

8. Computer Industry Plugs in to Green
Two critical environmental issues came to a head for computer makers in 2006: energy use and waste disposal. Both had been low-level concerns for years, but took on new urgency over the past twelve months.

Electronic waste, or e-waste, became a focus for several activist groups, which pressed major computer manufacturers to provide the ways and means to take back used machines for decommissioning, reuse, recycling, or other disposition. Largely as the result of boycotts, protests, and shareholder actions, Apple, Dell, HP, and other companies made significant commitments. Greenpeace shook things up with its ratings of companies' efforts on toxics and recycling, the first such ranking ever made.

Things are even more heated on the energy front. Millions of computer servers operating 24/7 -- processing e-mail, operating Web sites, and managing just about everything else in our digital and wireless world -- have become gluttonous energy users. One factoid: A single high-powered rack of computer servers consumes enough energy each year to power a hybrid car across the United States 337 times. And with customers of server and chip manufacturers paying those growing monthly energy bills, computer hardware manufacturers have found themselves in a race to the top, competing on who can be most efficient.

Both energy and waste issues were factored into a new green-computing standard, called EPEAT, introduced mid-year. Within months, more than 300 computers had met the standard. Talk about computer upgrades.

9. Green Chemicals Become Supercritical
The notions of "green chemistry" and "sustainable chemistry" may seem odd, if not oxymoronic, but both are becoming part of the industry's vernacular, thanks in large part to increased pressures to reduce toxic substances in both chemical processes and products.

The European Union proposed an "action plan" to boost chemistry innovation on the continent by focusing R&D on what it dubbed "SusChem," shorthand for sustainable chemistry. On the U.S. side of the pond, pressure came from shareholder groups, which began pressing companies as varied as DuPont and Whole Foods to better disclose the risks of toxic chemicals in products, and to push for greener alternatives. Even the normally taciturn U.S. EPA called on Corporate America to cut chemical use.

Some companies, like S.C. Johnson, were acknowledged as leaders, along with others that have made strides in green chemistry. It's only a handful of innovators so far, but with the right catalysts it could turn into a chain reaction.

10. Green Becomes an Engine of Growth
Two thousand six may be the year that green business crossed the line from a movement to a market. It was long in coming, of course, with several watershed moments, not the least of which was the launch of GE's Ecomagination campaign in 2005. But in 2006, company initiatives to harness "green" as an engine for topline growth hit their stride. GE, for one, announced that it was ahead of its plan to reach $20 billion in annual sales of Ecomagination products by 2010.

GE wasn't alone. Dupont launched its own initiative, committing to $6 billion in new revenue from "business offerings addressing safety, environment, energy, and climate challenges." Dow came on board with the aforementioned water initiative. Carpet maker Interface introduced a consulting service to help organizations as diverse as Sara Lee and NASA get their sustainability programs off the ground. Caterpillar launched an ambitious business unit to develop a remanufacturing industry in China. And a wide range of innovators developed new, clean technologies for everything from bottles to buildings to boats -- part of the year's overall boom in clean-tech activity.

It's all part of the Big Green Opportunity -- in theory, at least. It's not yet clear that companies are ready to seize the moment. A sobering study by the Conference Board found that a majority of big companies concerned with corporate responsibility issues lack an active strategy to develop new business opportunities based on those concerns.

Will sustainability truly become an engine for business opportunity and growth? That's a story for another year.

Maybe 2007?

| | | | |

---

CLICK HERE TO RECEIVE AUTOMATIC E-MAIL UPDATES WHENEVER A NEW ARTICLE IS PUBLISHED TO 'TWO STEPS FORWARD'

---

Comments

[Andrew]

I would add that the carbon retail market is about to boom in 2007 after having a steady start since 2004. A new report on the carbon offset retail market shows that retail offset providers face several challenges in supplying credible, cost effective offsets to the market. After finding a price of £1.5 ton/CO2 per carbon credits in US, I was surprised to see prices in different carbon offset websites from different countries ranging from £2.50 up to £12.40 with an average of £5.10 tonne/CO2. In the Brisith case price ranges from £7.40 to £9.00 tonne/CO2 which I see ludicrous because this could mean that we pay more without making a real benefit on the environment. This make me wonder if the price this offfset providers charge is really the cost of the project or the money is being taken by intermediaries. I think this market needs more transparency so we as consumers can evaluate the offset quality, where the money goes, how the project are selected and benefits they provide to the environment and communities. It will be sad to see that our hopes to mitigate Global Warming by offseting our emissions are not helping as they should. CarbonSMS.com recently posted some questions that we should ask offset providers when buying carbon credits as reference. In addition to carbon offsetting we need to take other measures that could have more impact.

[Caractacus]

Of course, if we look at the Stern Review, the target recommended by most scientists of 400 ppm CO2e is dismissed as bad for business. Stern doesn't even think 450 is 'realistic' because he'd have to give up economic growth. So he's aiming for 550, if a whole lot of things come together, which I beg leave to doubt. Meanwhile he makes much of the opportunities for fat returns on investment and I notice that Paul Wolfowitz is enthusiastic, talking about a plan he and Jolly Green Gordon (Brown) have to make the developing world, who will bear the worst consequences, pay for a range of very profitable high-tech adaptation measures on credit, via the World Bank.

Perhaps we could get Bono or Bob Geldof to stage a soothing media event to celebrate this, while the City of London rejoices.

[Jessica]

Here's a closely related list of the Top 10 green corporate initiatives of 2006. There's a little overlap, but not too much.

[Anne]

Timing of the EPA announcement about changes to the Toxics Release Inventory Rule -- right before Christmas, as many reclined in a carb induced haze -- seemed to be designed to keep this action off of the "10 worst" lists. The opacity of the information provided on the EPA website doesn't help even the above-average reader to figure out the impact. (But, BTW, the SBA has announced that this will be "good for small business".)

Joel, maybe you can shine some light on this one?

[Erich J. Knight]

I tryed to post about Terra Preta soil technology, my number one vote for your list.

I got a spam message rejection

Just Google " erich J. Knight" to see the post with all the links.

Thanks, Erich

[iridescent cuttlefish]

I notice that "green chemistry" has made the list, but I'm a little confused about this. At one point, Joel, you reviewed chemurgy rather dismissively, implying that technical innovations were still needed in order to really revive this suppressed science, while on the other hand you also cautioned against the potential for green-washing, especially at the hands of folks like James Woolsey who went from CIA director to hemp spokesman in a relatively short time. Something doesn't smell right here.

First off, the processes used by Ford to make his bio-car were fairly well refined already by 1932. Further refinements & patents came from Germany, both during and after the war...technical feasibility is not wanting. Control, both political and economic, exerted by those who profit from the hydrocarbon economy is. You don't have to toss around words like "conspiracy" to see which of the bread is getting buttered here.

What I find most irksome here is not the old story of vested monopolies pretending to act in the public interest, but rather the focus on green chemistry as a fuel science. Biomass is not the greatest promise of chemurgy--product applications, specifically in replacing everything made from petroleum, is. Consider the environmental and social impact of getting rid of plastics...

My fear is that when the chemurgy revival finally comes, it'll be controlled by the same interests who conspired to bury it (see Dave West's "Low, Dishonest Decade") and instead just continue the practice of collusion, suppression and the age-old business of steering artificial economies of scarcity. Business as usual...

[Randy]

Walmart green, yah right. How about greenwashing? How can you call yourself green when you import cheap plastic crap from the other side of the world. This stuff then ends up the the landfill, often within 3 months of purchase. Let's see their report card on percent of goods they import and then we can talk green. Green is good when green is local.

[Carlos]

Joel,

What happened with Wal-Mart's solar project? Was it delayed? Any company got the contract? I would love if you could keep us posted. I did some research and I haven't found any news regarding this subject.

Regards,

Carlos Serra

[Joel Makower]

Here's the latest on the Wal-mart solar RFP.

-- Joel